My mother commented that while I'm introverted, I'm not anti-social, and I'm certainly not autistic. We'd been wondering after a diagnosis for some time, but my mother has now decided that because I've assimilated to my environment it's okay. I can't keep eye contact, I have a melt down if my talking goes off track, and I do avoid people. She just... she makes me sad and mad. How do I go about a diagnosis without her? Do you think it's worth pursuing?
Anonymous
Oy vey.
Many autistic people aren’t in the least bit antisocial. A lot of us aren’t even all that introverted, but can be driven to both introvertedness and antisocialness by the way society treats us. Being social doesn’t even begin to disqualify you from being autistic, and I’m sure I can find other autistic people right here on tumblr who’ll agree with that, if you think a wake up call might work on your mother.
Otherwise, often the best way to look into diagnosis is to get a referral from your GP or bring it up with your psychiatrist if you already have one. It can be difficult, because there are a lot of misguided notions out there like the ones your mother expressed. In the end, it’s about whether it’s worth it to you. If you feel it would make a difference for you, you should pursue it regardless of what your mother thinks. She’s not the one who struggles with eye contact or has meltdowns, after all.
My dad has given me several articles on Autism, and I'm beginning to think he thinks I'm on the spectrum. I've long suspected thus. My mother, on the other hand, is pro-autism speaks/finding a cure because her friend's son has asperger's, she thinks knows exactly what it looks like. She's resistant to me seeking a diagnosis on this. How do I go about it without making her mad?
Anonymous
Honestly? This is about you, not her. Unless her anger is very uncomfortable or dangerous to you, worry more about your feelings, rather than hers. If you have to, ask for your dad’s help, since it sounds like he might understand. Your mother may not even need to know about it.
If it is important that you talk to her about it, then there’s something to keep in mind: Modern rhetoric is on autism is still very parent-blaming. The days of the “refrigerator mother” might be largely over, but all these things science keeps thinking might be “causing” autism feels like blaming, too. Too old, too young, where you live, what you eat, how much money you have…these are all correlations, but they’re often put out there by journalists as causations, and that’s wrong.
Unfortunately, it also gives the impression that in some way, if a parent had just done something differently, their kid wouldn’t have autism. In truth, these things are likely just coincidences, but no one tells parents that. So many parents, consciously or subconsciously, end up with the feeling that if their child is autistic, it would be their own fault. Organizations like Autism Speaks don’t help them get through that feeling.
That is most likely what you’re up against, or at least part of it. It’s terribly unfortunate, and terribly common, for resistance to diagnoses of neurodivergence to come from this feeling, for parents. And your mother needs to understand that this is in no way about her. It’s about you. It’s about how you feel and what’s right for you. Do you feel like there’s something “wrong” with you, or do you simply see that you have differences, and want a name for that?
Think about what you want to say and how you want to say it. What this means to you. As I’ve advised before, write it down if you need to. If that doesn’t work, you may have to be more underhanded about it, but again, ultimately, this is about you, not her.
Have you ever heard of the Wendrow case? What are your thoughts?
Anonymous
The Wendrow case. My thoughts on the Wendrow case…hoo boy. I didn’t know about the Wendrow case until I received this ask, and in the end, I had to have my husband read up on it for me, because I couldn’t get through a single article without crying. They were that nauseating. It’s hard to elucidate my feelings on this, when every article I found didn’t bother much with facts and chose instead to exonerate the father and lavish stomach-churning amounts of pity on him.
Trigger Warning: Rape, abuse, ableism.
For those who don’t know, the Wendrow case involved a young non-verbal autistic girl who, via a method of communication known as Facilitated Communication, made claims that her father had raped her multiple times. To make a long short story, in the end, because she couldn’t perform like a trained monkey in court, her father was acquitted.
Do I sound bitter? I can’t help it. The articles really were gross. Just the very fact that the police taking the girl’s word as true is regarded as them “not trying to find the truth” is enough to make me want to cry. My feelings on the matter are thus a bit tangled, and revolve mostly around the criticism (dare I even call it) of Facilitated Communication, which is so rife with allistic privilege, I want to slap someone.
Those who are tested—yes, tested—sometimes prove unable to communicate via FC under pressure, and people (all of them allistic) generally ask “How could it be that someone who can otherwise write speeches etc. etc. etc. with this form of communication suddenly can’t use it in a testing environment?” And because they’re allistic (and maybe because they don’t remember or know how uncomfortable testing environments are) they figure, hey, FC must not really work, and it must be the words of the Facilitator and not the autistic person themselves.
They think this because they’re allistic and thus they’ll never be stuffed in a box like a guinea pig and asked to prove that their method of communication is viable, knowing all the while that if they fail, their rights as a human beings will be stripped from them.
So when using FC in court, all the girl was able to produce was gobbledegook, which led to the father being acquitted. Her Facilitator, according to my husband, was painted really atrociously in the articles, while the father was held up as the poor victim of a misandrist witchhunting country out for tasty tasty manblood. And maybe he is innocent, but when I think about this, I can’t help but doubt. Consider how many allistic women can’t handle the pressure of a rape case. Hell, I know that I, having already faced the pain and horror of being judged unfairly due to my struggles with communication, might not be able to handle what they asked of this girl. I, who can speak for myself, am not sure I would’ve fared any better in court.
I can’t sit here and accept that FC doesn’t work and the father is innocent, because I know what it’s like to be autistic from the inside. And even if he is innocent, it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter because no matter how many times FC does work, it’s cases like this one that will be used as precedent instead. It’s cases like this one that will be used to strip autistics of their rights and force them to remain in unsafe environments.
In all the furor to condemn the case, no one in the press stopped and thought. They didn’t think “holy shit, this girl might have been sent back to a man who constantly rapes her.” That’s the thing. She might well have gone home to a place where she’s raped every day and can do nothing to defend herself. And even if she wasn’t, other autistics will be, helped along by this case. And I can tell you how that makes me feel: It fucking terrifies me.
I'm so mad. As I was driving home this morning, I saw a van that had written all over it, in blue paint, Autism Speaks propaganda and stuff about autism awareness month, and getting "justice" for their 6-year-old son. The buzzwords they used made it obvious that these people drank the friggin' kool aid. I felt like I got a momentary glimpse at someone allowing their own son's future to be compromised in the name of self-martyrhood. I wish I could have helped the kid somehow.
…justice!?
What even…justice!? Justice from what? How? I just…I do not get allistic people sometimes, I really don’t.
I don’t blame you for being mad. And I understand wanting to help their kid. Though frankly, I admire your self-restraint. I’m not sure I’d have been able to resist the urge to get out of my car and take my keys to the sides of the Eugenicsmobile. Maybe find something sufficiently sharp to take out the tires.
[“I’m raising a child with autism. What’s your superpower?”
Resisting the urge to strange every person who thinks they’re Captain Good Parent for raising an autistic child.]
Could we please just stop acting like raising an autistic child is something that requires being bitten by a radioactive spider or being a bulletproof alien from the planet Krypton? Please? Because it’s really fucking insulting to have people say things that imply that the very act of raising you requires greater than human ability.
P.S. Before any allistics try to crawl into my inbox to gaslight me with how I don’t understand what’s really being said here, I’d like to make it abundantly clear that I have no fucks to give. If your intentions are really so good, fucking think harder next time about how you sound when you say this shit!
[“My son has autism but he’s not autistic!”
So does he keep it in a jar on his shelf or something?]
No, I’m not kidding or exaggerating. This is the sort of shit drifting around the autism tag right now. Rhetoric like this.
This is why “person with autism” is such problematic language. Some parents try to defend it with claims that it’s because they see their child as a person first WHARGARBL. I suppose there’s something to be said for this person’s honesty.
Please note that I’m not saying autistic people shouldn’t define themselves as “people with autism” if they so choose. But allistic people have no right to dictate what language gets applied to us. Whether they realize it or not, when they talk about “people with autism” a part of them is trying to separate autism from person, as if autism is some parasite that has taken up residence in their child’s body rather than a very real part of their child.
This is a genuine–though slightly paraphrased–quote from a person who honestly believes having autism and being autistic are two distinct things. That attitude is vicious and harmful, so when you see autistics speak out against person-first language, know that this is why.
[“I love someone with autism!”
Sorry, all out of cookies and fucks to give.]
I really wish people would stop with the “I love someone with autism” images. Like, what, should we canonize you, you fucking saint? The idea that it’s necessary to declare that one loves an autistic person, as if it’s something that’s normally not done, is so horrifying and hurtful. And as you can imagine, since it’s April, the damn images are all over the autism tag.
[Get diagnosed Aspergers after parents read an article about it somewhere
Parents still refuse to listen when you say you just can’t handle something]
Mod note: Anon creation.
Kinda reminds me of my mom. :(